Sector · Financial Services

Your AI drafts the FICA file. A person still signs off.

It reads new client documents and compiles the FICA file, watches transactions for the patterns your policy flags, and drafts the report before the window closes. Self-hosted cuts vendor count and licence bill together.

What your AI would do in Financial Services.

Concrete jobs an AI operating system set up around your business could take on, including the ones that catch a problem before it lands on your desk.

01

Reads a new client's documents and drafts the FICA file for a person to verify.

02

Watches transactions for the patterns your compliance policy flags, and drafts the report.

03

Answers routine policy or account questions so your advisors spend their time on the calls that need a person.

04

Flags an account's activity drifting from its normal pattern before the monthly review, not during it.

cases

97,975 cases.

of digital banking fraud reported by South African banks in 2024, an 86% increase on 2023

SABRIC, Annual Crime Statistics, 2024

What your AI does about it:

It watches transactions for the patterns your compliance policy flags and drafts the report for a person to review.

Imagine it. Here it is.

See it work.

A short, fictional scenario. Watch the AI handle it end to end.

Compliance console: Meridian Capital (fictional)
● Onboarding queue: New client: Bongani Radebe, documents uploaded

Meridian Capital is made up. Watch the AI compile a FICA file.

Read what happens

Onboarding queue: New client: Bongani Radebe, documents uploaded Checking ID, proof of address and source of funds documents Bongani Radebe: ID verified, proof of address dated within 3 months, source of funds: salary slip attached All three FICA documents check out. One flag: the proof of address is a different municipality to the ID. Document | Status ID | Verified Proof of address | Present, address mismatch Source of funds | Present You choose. Flag mismatch for compliance review: FICA file drafted with the address mismatch flagged for a compliance officer to check before approval. File as complete: Filed as complete. No flag raised.

R 4.90M

Typical annual licence spend

Across 8 common financial services tools

R 4.41M

Recoverable each year

After self-hosted OSS migration

3

Sector pain points we cover

From licensing to compliance to access control

The financial services stack, on the books

Tap a tool. See the open-source swap and the saving.

Bars show what the typical financial services firm spends annually on each licence. The sage portion is what the hosted open-source equivalent costs.

Typical Financial Services stack

8 tools · R 4.90M/yr in licences

● Migrate to OSS · save 90%
Proprietary
Hosted OSS

Replace

Temenos T24

Core Banking · R 2.22M per year

With

Apache Fineract / Mifos

Self-hosted on your infra

Annual savings

R 2.00M

After hosting · approx 90% reduction

See migration brief →

Current annual spend

R 4.90M

Estimated OSS hosting

R 490K

Annual savings

R 4.41M

Tap any tool to see the open-source replacement and the per-tool saving

Where financial services time and money leak

What we hear on every financial services discovery call.

01

Compliance files compiled by hand under a deadline

FICA files and suspicious-transaction reports get pulled together manually against a clock. An AI drafts the file from the documents; a person signs off.

02

Regulated-data SaaS is a compliance minefield

Every vendor touching customer data needs an agreement under POPIA. Self-hosting slashes vendor count to near zero.

03

Core platforms are rental traps

Multi-year contracts and mandatory upgrade cycles on core systems. Apache Fineract and Mifos are viable open source alternatives for credit and microfinance.

How we handle the financial services edges

The sector-specific things we get right.

01 · Concern

POPIA, FICA, and FSCA stacking

Multi-regulator compliance. We produce the evidence package each regulator asks for from one underlying audit trail.

02 · Concern

Cryptographic key management on SA soil

Signing keys and customer PII encryption keys should live on infrastructure you control. Self-hosted HSM integrations keep SARB happy.

03 · Concern

Incident reporting windows are tight

Information Regulator expects breach reporting inside hours. Our SIEM setup detects, contains, and produces the notification draft before the clock runs out.

What we bring to a financial services engagement

The services your sector usually starts with.

Now it's real.

Four things stay true, whatever we build for you.

  • Your hardware or ours

    On your server, on ours, or on a machine in your office running an open model. Your call.

  • A person approves what matters

    Payments, deletions and anything going to a client wait for a yes from you or someone you choose.

  • Every action logged

    You can see what it read, what it did and why, for every task.

  • Built with POPIA in mind

    We set it up the way we set up any system that handles personal information, with the same care our compliance work gets.

Questions people ask

Does the AI approve a client without compliance sign-off?

No. It drafts the file and flags anything unusual; a compliance officer still approves every account.

How does this reduce our POPIA vendor exposure?

Fewer SaaS vendors touching customer data means fewer operator agreements and DPIAs to maintain.

Can it help with signing-key management for SARB requirements?

Yes, self-hosted HSM integrations keep customer PII encryption keys on infrastructure you control.

How fast can it help with an Information Regulator breach window?

Our SIEM setup detects and contains incidents and drafts the notification, so the clock isn't working against a manual process.

Your numbers, not the industry average. Free audit, on us.

Send your licence list. We'll map it to what an AI and open source could take off your plate, and quote a migration window.